Global STO Study

Things move fast in the world of blockchain technology. From the heady days of the $20k Bitcoin to the crash and burn of the ICO craze, a new acronym has risen from the ashes : “ STO” (Security Token Offering). Security Token Offerings are a means to represent existing, regulated financial products like company equity or real estate as digital tokens, allowing a direct, streamlined connection between issuers and investors.

At BlockState, we are heading the wave of this new paradigm by building the technology to support security token issuances and connecting the ecosystem of traditional financial institutions, issuers and investors. So naturally we have a deep insight about the dynamics and players of this market that is projected to grow to eight trillion US dollars by 2025 (KPMG, WEF).  We conducted this study to give an overview of where the global community of financial technology innovators stands in terms of adoption and maturity of the value chain.

In particular, we were interested in the quality and quantity of Security Token Offerings that have taken place to date. To do so, we analysed more than 120 projects that have done or are planning to do an STO and looked at factors including their funding amount, the types of assets that were tokenised, technology used and many more.

See full results

Top findings of the study

The geographical perspective

Top 10 countries by number of STOs

6 out of the top 10 countries are European, but the US dominates globally

Amount raised by each country in USD*

Switzerland is the European champion, but still dwarfed by the US

Number of STOs per country*

The US is by far the leading country with 34 STOs

The historical perspective

Number of STOs per year and industry

The number of STOs skyrocketed in 2018 and is continuing to grow

Target funding vs actual amount raised over time

Actual amounts raised are closer to the targeted amount

Current phases of STO

The market is booming with around 30% of all STOs currently planned or live

Number of STOs per industry

Financial services are by far the dominating industries

Infrastructure & Asset types

Distribution of protocols used for STOs

Ethereum is the clear technological leader

Distribution of asset classes tokenised

The majority of security tokens are companies’ equity

The financial perspective

Average percentage of target funding raised by size of target funding

Smaller STOs appear to be more successful

Average percentage of target funding raised by region

On average, STOs managed to raise 68% of their target funding amounts in Western Europe

Distribution of funds raised by each industry

Finance is the industry with the most successful STOS

The world comparative perspective

Capital raising methods by number*

Rising number of STOs in comparison to ICOs and IPOs

Capital raising methods by volume*

STOs closing the gap with ICOs

Database

The following table contains the data on which the “Global STO study 2019” is based, collecting information of 120+ companies around the globe until June 18 2019.

Feel free to use the search function in the top right corner to filter by different categories, e. g. Finance & Banking, Service, Real estate, etc. (Industry); Finished, Main sale, Private sale, etc. (Status); Switzerland, France, Malta, etc. (Country).

Methodology

Data sources

This study was based on secondary online research on 124 companies, with data up to date until the 18/06/2019. If you want to be added to our end table or modify some information, please email us at [email protected].

The STO data were extracted from the following listing sites: stoscope.com, icobench.com, stowise.com, stoanalytics.com, icomarks.com. We also used the companies’ corporate websites.

World comparative analysis

Data for volume and number of IPOs, ICOs and STOs were retrieved from, EY – Global IPO Trends (2017,2018,2019), ICObench – ICO Market Analysis (2017, 2018, 2019) and our own secondary research. Data points were available until the end of Q1 2019. The data for the rest of the year is based on projections.

IPOs – For IPOs, the volume forecasting was based on estimates found on Baker McKenzie’s 2019 Global Transaction Forecast. To determine the forecasted number of IPOs, we calculated the volume growth rate between 2018 and the forecasted volume for 2019 ([Volume 2019 – Volume 2018]/Volume 2018) and we assumed the same growth rate between these years for the number of IPOs (Number 2019= Number 2018*Volume Growth rate 2018-2019). We chose to exclude Q1 2019 for IPOs, this is to account for a particularly low Q1 2019 that diverges from the overall yearly trend.

ICOs – For ICOs and STOs, we made our own assumptions to come up with an estimation. This forecasting is a trend for the year to come rather than an exact estimate. For ICOs, we calculated the average growth rate of ICO volume and number from Q4 2018 to Q1 2019 ([Growth rate Q4 2018+Growth rate Q1 2019]/2; where Growth rate Q4 2018= [Q4 2018-Q3 2018]/Q3 2018). We then applied this growth rate to Q1 2019 to find Q2 2019, to Q2 2019 to find Q3 and so on (For instance, Q2 2019=Q1 2019*AGR Q4 2018 to Q1 2019). We finally summed the four quarters to have an estimation of number and volume of ICOs for 2019.

STOs – When it comes to STOs, the market has a smaller time span. Therefore, to avoid excessive bias, we decided to rely on the average of several estimations. The first forecasting was done by calculating the STO growth rate (for both volume and number) between Q1 2018 and Q1 2019 ([Q1 2019-Q1 2018]/Q1 2018) and by applying the same growth rate from the full year 2018 to the full year 2019 (2019= 2018* Growth rate Q1 2018 to Q1 2019). Our second model looked at the annual average growth rate of STOs starting from Q2 2018 ([Growth rate Q2 2018+…+Growth rate Q1 2019]/4). We then applied this growth rate to the full year 2018 to obtain another forecast for 2019 (2019= 2018*AAG). Of these two estimates, we took the average to come to a final number.

Eligibility

All the companies included have raised or have announced that they will raise capital through a Security Token Offering. We did not account for ICOs, IEOs and other forms of capital raising methods (unless explicitly specified). We did not exclude companies based on geographical location.

Quantitative methods

The numbers and charts above are based on usable answers for each category. We have used all STOs data (regardless of their stage from announced to finished) in most cases, the graphs regarding amount raised only include data points with funds available. Not in all cases did all sources have useful data. Where no percentage symbol is shown, the charts display all the entire set of usable answers found on the different sources.

For any questions relating to this study and suggestions for further development, please reach out to the BlockState press team at [email protected]

Get in touch

Stay up to date on all the latest developments.

Your privacy is important to us.

We employ technology like cookies on our site to personalise content and ads and analyse our traffic. By clicking below, you consent to the use of these tools across the web. You can update your consent at anytime by revisiting this site.